![Olympic Games and intellectual property rights (Is parody permissible?) | ONDA TECHNO Intl. Patent Attys.[Japan Patent Firm] | Gifu City](/wp/wp-content/themes/standard_en/images/common/logo.svg){kind=logo}
![Olympic Games and intellectual property rights (Is parody permissible?) | ONDA TECHNO Intl. Patent Attys.[Japan Patent Firm] | Gifu City](/wp/wp-content/themes/standard_en/images/common/logo-sm.svg){kind=logo}
2020.7.30
Trademark
2020.9.1
Trademark
Appeal decision report (THE KANSAI)
2020.7.2
Trademark
Appeal decision report (kojifujita)
2020.6.15
Trademark
Appeal decision report – INFINITY was allowed to be registered because INFINITY and cited trademark INFINITE are dissimilar
2020.6.4
Trademark
Appeal decision report – Ghana was allowed to be registered because it has acquired distinctiveness through use
2020.6.1
Trademark
Trademark decision report (the thermochromic sign “Ready to drink”)
2020.5.12
Trademark
Appeal decision report – eK (Standard characters) was allowed to be registered because it is impossible to determine, based on the provided evidence, that the trademark consists solely of a very simple and common mark
2020.5.12
Trademark
Appeal decision report (Salonpas)
2016.8.15
Trademark
The JPO appeal examiners concluded that ITI is dissimilar to iti (stylized), Hiragana and Katakana characters
2016.8.15
Trademark
Facebook 
LinkedIn
X
YouTube