![The JPO’s Manner to Judge the Distinctiveness of an Applied Mark. | ONDA TECHNO Intl. Patent Attys.[Japan Patent Firm] | Gifu City](/wp/wp-content/themes/standard_en/images/common/logo.svg){kind=logo}
![The JPO’s Manner to Judge the Distinctiveness of an Applied Mark. | ONDA TECHNO Intl. Patent Attys.[Japan Patent Firm] | Gifu City](/wp/wp-content/themes/standard_en/images/common/logo-sm.svg){kind=logo}
2024.10.25
Trademark
2024.9.27
Trademark
Could the JPO allow the registration of a trademark application for a word mark consisting of a common word and a country name?
2024.9.12
Trademark
JPO: Trademark “COOL WINE” Registrable – Neither indicating the quality of goods/services nor misleading as to the quality of goods/services
2024.8.28
Trademark
Could the JPO allow the registration of the trademark application of a word mark consisting of a coined word and a country name?
2024.8.27
Trademark
Is it permissible to register a parody trademark?
2024.7.31
Trademark
JPO: Trademark “smart” Not Registrable – Lacking distinctiveness
2024.7.31
Trademark
The JPO’s Manner to Judge the Main Part of an Applied Mark .
2024.6.25
Trademark
JPO: Is “Writing a Word Mark in Cursive Script” an Effective Method to Acquire Distinctiveness for an Applied Mark?
2024.6.17
Patent
Trademark
Design
Utility Model
The JPO Status Report 2024 was released.
2024.5.30
Trademark
Facebook 
LinkedIn
X
YouTube